Home > Net Runtime > Net Runtime 2.0 Error System.stackoverflowexception

Net Runtime 2.0 Error System.stackoverflowexception

However, that practice is currently discouraged because significant additional code is required to reliably catch a stack overflow exception and continue program execution. Cheers, Wim Wim Hollebrandse --- http://www.zealandit.com Reply Garbin Participant 1302 Points 1503 Posts ASPInsiders Re: StackOverflowException Sep 09, 2005 04:51 AM|Garbin|LINK Hi, without knowing the code that you cut&pasted, Isuggest you Privacy Statement| Terms of Use| Contact Us| Advertise With Us| CMS by Umbraco| Hosted on Microsoft Azure Feedback on ASP.NET| File Bugs| Support Lifecycle Try and look for an equivalent call in your own stack. check over here

If you need to work around this issue, please reference Microsoft.Net.Http directly. New thread system id - 3292 (f08.e94): C++ EH exception - code e06d7363 (first chance) [3/20/2006 9:28:27 AM] First chance exception - 0xe06d7363 caused by thread with system id 3732 First more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed It may have to do with this.

I have mentioned the !dumpstack command before. Any ideas? Consequently, you should write your code to detect and prevent a stack overflow. Note: In the stack it looks like EvalBinaryOp calls Eval which calls Eval which calls EvalBinaryOp.

For example, if your app depends on recursion, use a counter or a state condition to terminate the recursive loop. For more information, see ICLRPolicyManager Interface.Version Information.NET FrameworkAvailable since 1.1SilverlightAvailable since 2.0Windows Phone SilverlightAvailable since 7.0Thread Safety Any public static (Shared in Visual Basic) members of this type are thread safe. This is not a paid support site and no-one is going to drop everything and help you just because you're having an emergency. –Chris Dec 2 '09 at 14:15 1 To do so, I ran: !clrstack -p The argument of -p asks SOS to list out all of the parameters for each stack frame.

Any instance members are not guaranteed to be thread safe. New thread system id - 3804 [3/20/2006 9:27:50 AM] Thread exited. If not, you can quickly wireup an event handler. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/974031 In this instance a stack overflow is most probably a recursive issue, although, without code??

I've a solution containing 5 Projects (3 Web / 2 "normal").One of thenormal projects contain controls and webparts the other one contains global classes used by the other 4 projects. See Also: StackOverflowExceptionSyntax[System.Runtime.InteropServices.ComVisible(true)]public sealed class StackOverflowException : SystemExceptionRemarksStackOverflowException is thrown for execution stack overflow errors, typically in case of a very deep or unbounded recursion. Reload to refresh your session. {{offlineMessage}} Try Microsoft Edge, a fast and secure browser that's designed for Windows 10 Get started Store Store home Devices Microsoft Surface PCs & tablets Xbox Wednesday, June 28, 2006 12:57 PM Reply | Quote Microsoft is conducting an online survey to understand your opinion of the Msdn Web site.

Contact Details If you're at a conference and think I might be there too, or just want to talk about something I might be interested in, drop me a line. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/tess/2008/03/31/net-case-study-stackoverflow-exception-when-using-a-complex-rowfilter/ I grabbed this config from Tess' blog. Since it is something we see from time to time and it was a bit to long to answer in the comments, here is the why and the how… Problem description: The first sign that something was wrong was this event getting fired across the whole front-end tier: 03 Jul 2009 08:32:43 AM
Computer: WEBTIER14
Monitor Title: "Event Log Monitor"

Edit: Also I'm running this on two servers, 2008R2 and 2003, the exact same code, on 2008R2 it works fine, but on 2003 it stops the application pool. .net stack-overflow web-services check my blog Here’s a short snippet (with the project details masked out): ...
CompanyName.Project.Web.Logic.Component.Method1(System.String, System.Int32)
CompanyName.Project.Web.Logic.Component.Method2(System.String)
CompanyName.Project.Web.Logic.Component.Method1(System.String, System.Int32)
CompanyName.Project.Web.Logic.Component.Method2(System.String)
CompanyName.Project.Web.Logic.Component.Method1(System.String, System.Int32)
CompanyName.Project.Web.Logic.Component.Method2(System.String)
CompanyName.Project.Web.Logic.Component.Method1(System.String, System.Int32)
CompanyName.Project.Web.Logic.Component.Method2(System.String)
| Search MSDN Search all blogs Search this blog My situation seems to be a little more special.

share|improve this answer answered Dec 2 '09 at 14:13 Bravax 8,51762962 Agreed, sounds like unexpected data –Ryan Emerle Dec 2 '09 at 14:17 add a comment| up vote 1 How can I discover the Python version in QGIS? If you already have Microsoft.Net.Http there kpm throws the following error: ---------- System.Exception: TODO: Circular dependency references not supported. this content All rights reserved.Terms of Use|Trademarks|Privacy Statement|Site Feedback {{offlineMessage}} Try Microsoft Edge, a fast and secure browser that's designed for Windows 10 Get started Store Store home Devices Microsoft Surface PCs &

Unfortunately, all managed threads show with a thread id of XXXX, and we are not able to switch to any of them to run !clrstack. Everythink works fine when I'm developing on my local machine. All rights reserved.

Member muratg commented Dec 30, 2014 So are you saying that this package is bad and it should fail?

Here we can see that the recursive loop seems to involve EvalBinaryOp calling Eval which again calls EvalBinaryOp. I never had a beta or ctp version installed either on the machine doing the precompiling nor on the "production" machine. The value column on that line is 0412522c, which is another memory reference. You signed out in another tab or window.

Nothing has changed since yesterday, and everything worked fine before. This was made clear by literally hundreds of repeated frames on our call stack. This documentation is archived and is not being maintained. http://goglospex.com/net-runtime/net-runtime-2-0-error-system-typeinitialization.html That number is the memory location of the object we need.

Member davidfowl commented Mar 5, 2015 Closing this and opening a new bug about framework references being treated as packages davidfowl added 3 - Done and removed 1 - Ready labels For a list of initial property values for a StackOverflowException object, see the StackOverflowException constructors.Version ConsiderationsIn the .NET Framework 1.0 and 1.1, you could catch a StackOverflowException object (for example, to Pretty soon after, we started to notice some issues cropping up that were affecting the performance and stability of the whole site. More up-to-date alternative for "avoiding something like the plague"?

You still cannot handle the exception from user code. The next parameter is the name of the library we want to load into the debugger. We also noted that CPU usage was spiking erratically and was well above the average we would expect for the number of firewall connections we had open. asked 7 years ago viewed 3646 times active 4 years ago Blog Stack Overflow Podcast #97 - Where did you get that hat?!

Thanks Josh http://riverasp.net Reply Tess says: April 1, 2008 at 2:35 am Eber, yeah, that is probably the reason… Reply gOODiDEA.NET says: April 1, 2008 at 8:28 pm Web: JSLab Standard You signed in with another tab or window. Exception of type System.StackOverflowException was thrown. As such, running adplus in its default configuration was causing it to grab the crash dump too frequently and not giving us the fault that was causing the complete teardown.

See AlsoExceptionSystem NamespaceHandling and Throwing ExceptionsReturn to top Show: Inherited Protected Print Export (0) Print Export (0) Share IN THIS ARTICLE Is this page helpful? Help, my office wants infinite branch merges as policy; what other options do we have? How about debugging .net 4.0 (beta 1) dumps Tatham?